Friday, October 22, 2010

Thursday, February 18, 2010

ABC Committee Campaign Speech

Recently I had the honor of running for the At-Large position for CTA's ABC Committee. This committee is in charge of administering CTA's PAC funds. The following was my speech to CTA's State Council:

David, Dean Gail, carolyn, Council,

It's truly an honor to address this body for the first time and I'm grateful to m colleagues in the Sweetwater Education Association for the opportunity to serve with each of you.

Although I've met many of you at conferences, committees and the Read Across America table, I should take a moment to introduce myself. I am the son of Ampelio and MarĂ­a Rodriguez; two hard working people who rose from humble origins, and who by example taught my brothers an I, the value of education, dedication, responsibility and service. Armed with these fundamental principles, I began a teaching career in 1987.

Since then I've worn many hats for my local: Site Rep, Elections Chair, State Council member, Secretary, Communications Chair and all around web guy. However, nobody is more surprised than I, to find myself asking for your vote today.

I've taken pride in being a foot soldier. I'm proud that the communications plan that Alex mentioned is being used in trainings; that CTA staff is sharing it with locals going through difficult bargaining. That's what foot soldiers do. They work hard and in anonymity. Under normal circumstances I would have been happy to continue in that role. But circumstances haven't been normal for a while now.

I seek the position of ABC Minority At-Large out of a sense of conviction. A conviction born from the powerful lessons I learned during SEA's last round of bargaining. From the start we faced a Superintendent with a clear strategy: intimidate and lie, weaken the union, fast track to factfinding, and impose a contract. That strategy failed.

That experience taught me that organizing is paramount; that communication with members is the cornerstone of success; that there is power in collective action and most importantly, that school boards matter.

During the eighteen months of stalled bargaining, our School Board was disengaged, negligent and at times outright hostile. They fully endorsed our superintendent's tactics. At one point, a board member suggested that a 15% pay-cut was NOT out line. And after approving over 150 RIFs, they extended the superintendent's contract. School Boards matter a great deal!

We are living in a time when the enemies of public education are well entrenched, and our traditional allies are at best unrecognizable.

We are living in a time when tens of thousands of teachers across the country helped elect a President and a Congress, who in turn have dedicated more federal dollars to education than we've ever seen before; yet the best they can come up with is "Race to the Top."

School Boards matter more than ever!

We must dedicate effort, time and financial resources to taking back our schools! And given what's happening in Washington and Sacramento, the only way to do so is one school board at a time.

I know I should be asking for your vote with a big smile and a sunny disposition but I can't. I'm frustrated an angry! I see what's happening to locals up and down the state. The ridiculous proposals; big pay cuts, unpaid furlough days, "do more with less." Increase the curriculum, shrink the school year and be accountable to the results. When did we become the national scapegoat?

I ask that you send me to ABC to be the voice of all minority groups in this room and of teachers of minority students, I will be an advocate and a liaison. I will work to bring in more minority leaders because we need more hands not fewer. Allow me to serve on a committee that recognizes you must have the resources you need to take back your schools!

Thank you.


Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Economic stimmulus package and education

As a California teacher I was curious to see CTA President David Sanchez behind Illinois Senator Dick Durbin at a Press Conference last week. Then I realized Durbin is on the Appropriations Committee. A key committee for the stimulus package. That led me to search for what is in the stimulus package for education. I found some answers in the New York Times.

The good news is that there is money for education in the Bill. The bad news is that while the House version had $150 billion for education, the Senate trimmed quite a bit of that. The Senate version contains about $83 billion for child care, public schools and universities.

The Senate bill is expected to pass today and then it goes to a Conference Committee where House and Senate leaders will work on a compromise bill that can be sent to President Obama for his signature.

If you'd like to read the full New York Times article click here...NYT.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Merging Career and College Paths.

 As we close another school year and high school graduates up and down the state go into the world armed with the knowledge and skills they’ve acquired, it’s important for us to reflect and look to the future. Education has always played multiple roles in the social development of our country. At the same time that schools are charged with maintaining and passing on our history and traditions, they are entrusted with giving tools to younger generations so that they can forge their paths into the future. Historically, while at times schools have been pillars that upheld the unequal and unjust social structures of segregation and ethnic biases, they’ve also been the laboratories where racial integration first took hold and has created generations of young adults for whom that era seems anachronistic and just plain odd. And as we embark on the 21st Century we must again ask ourselves what will California schools look like over the next 50 years?


For over two decades our state and our nation’s economy has moved away from industrial manufacturing towards a more service and information based economic model. We have moved from the creation and maintaining of widgets to the creation and managing of billions of gigabytes of information that travel around the world at amazing speeds. Furthermore, we continue to move from a nation based economy that competes with other nations in a zero-sum game to a globalized economy. Today’s graduates are some of the first graduates that will compete for jobs with a global workforce. And it’s not simply blue collar jobs factory jobs that are being outsourced, but jobs formerly considered “safe,” such as engineering and design are also up for grabs in this new “flat” world we live in. Given this, we must ask, are our schools doing all they can to prepare students for this new environment?


California schools operates under a model geared towards preparing every single child in high school for college. Every student follows a rigid academic program that adheres to the A-G curriculum required to enter California State Colleges. This is a laudable goal, to give every child the opportunity to go to college if he or she so desires. Especially because this came on the heels of tracking students, often with no other criteria than ethnicity, into either the “college track” or the “vocational/career path.” However, according to Edsource.com “in California, about half of public high school graduates go on to a publicly supported two- or four-year college. Others will attend private institutions in state, or private and public ones out of state.” Even if California does slightly better than the national average, based on Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers, roughly 30% of high school graduates in 2007 did not enroll in college. How are these students being served?


Perhaps a much better model is the Multiple Pathways proposal. The Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access, out of UCLA,  has been studying Multiple Pathways and have put out a series of papers. The paper by Jeannie Oakes and Marisa Saunders caught my eye. It’s entitled “Reforming California’s High Schools: College Prep for All? Reinvigorated Career and Technical Education? Or Multiple Pathways to both?”  In this paper the authors tear down the dichotomy between preparing for college or vocational education and propose that “California can and should prepare all student for both college and careers by creating Multiple Pathways through high school.” They propose that California schools must adopt programs which include the following three elements:


1. A college preparatory academic core (satisfying the A-G requirements for entry into CA public universities; 

2. A professional/technical core well grounded in academic and real-world standards; and 

3. Increasingly more demanding opportunities for field-based learning that deepen students' understanding of academic and technical knowledge through application in authentic situations.


For over a decade we’ve been seeing the poverty gap widen in this country. In our state the median income isn’t enough to purchase the average home, even after the crash and credit crunch. I truly believe schools must be vigilant to maintain the role of education as the great equalizer, the Silver Bullet that gives all students a fighting chance in an a very competitive job market. College for all? Of course! This must continue to be out goal. However we can ill afford to create a social underclass by not giving the non-college bound high school graduate the important skills needed to navigate the new global economy. Moreover, these are real world skills that would benefit all high school graduates.


 While the devil is in the details. It’s clear that schools in the future must look vastly different than what they look like today. Currently schools find themselves preparing students  to enter a job market that does not yet exist and we can barely fathom.  Today’s jobs in the biomedical field, web engineering and e-commerce development were non-existent when today’s graduating Seniors were born. Schools cannot keep up with the changes that our economy faces, however this is an argument for strengthening our public schools by creating programs and alliances with private industry in which truly no child is left behind because they are prepared with the necessary tools to take on the jobs of the future and not an irrelevant multiple choice exam.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

School enrollment to set record highs

Here is an interesting article from the Washington Post on the growing number of expected school enrollment...

Public school enrollment across the country will hit a record high this year with just under 50 million students, and the student population is becoming more diverse in large part because of growth in the Latino population, according to a new federal report. (Read the article)
As expected enrollment grows it becomes more and more important for education leaders, teachers and parents to ask themselves what schools will need to look like in the future. The answer is important to us all.